Experience

Won in the Tenth Circuit for a law firm client swept up in its client's divorce and bankruptcy claims.


WTO attorneys obtained complete affirmation of their trial court summary judgment victory for a law firm client that had been pulled into complex and messy litigation over its role in intertwined bankruptcy and divorce proceedings. The plaintiff has steadily pursued litigation in every available venue, and consistently lost, over the course of a decade.

In 2015, WTO successfully defended our client against this litigation before the Tenth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP). In its decision, the BAP wrote, “There are many great American success stories built upon unflinching stubborn determination in the face of incredible odds. Very few of them, however, can be found in the annals of litigation history. This case will not alter the landscape.”

Consistent with that assessment, the Tenth Circuit here reached an even more favorable conclusion than had the BAP: that the plaintiff’s claims failed based both on the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and issue preclusion (whereas the BAP affirmed based solely on issue preclusion).

Won Tenth Circuit victory for a law firm client in protracted litigation arising out of a divorce and bankruptcy characterized as "the most complex [the divorce court] has seen in 25 years." The plaintiff-husband sued WTO's client, which handled the bankruptcy proceedings for the plaintiff's ex-wife, and the ex-wife's divorce counsel, in federal court. The Tenth Circuit's ruling in this matter follows a 2015 ruling for our client from the Tenth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.
Attorneys